Gillian Frank
Princeton University, CSR (Center for the Study of Religion), Department Member
- History of Conservatism, History of Sexuality, Women's History, Gender History, History of Religion, Gender Studies, and 13 moreHistory of Childhood and Youth, Religion, Gender and Sexuality, Gender, Gender and Sexuality, Feminist Theory, Religion and Sexuality, History of Race and Ethnicity, History of Childhood, Civil Rights (History), American Religion, North American Religions, Women's Studies, and Jewish Studiesedit
- I am currently a visiting fellow at Princeton University’s Center for the Study of Religion and a lecturer in the Pro... moreI am currently a visiting fellow at Princeton University’s Center for the Study of Religion and a lecturer in the Program in Gender and Sexuality Studies.
I am also Managing Editor (North America) of Notches: (re)marks on the history of sexuality <notchesblog.com>.
Say hello to me at gfrank at princeton dot edu.
My research on the intersections of gender, sexuality, race, religion and popular culture has appeared in The Journal of the History of Sexuality, Gender and History and The Journal of Religion and Popular Culture.
I am co-editor of a forthcoming anthology, Devotions and Desires: Histories of Sexuality and Religion in the 20th Century United States. I also am a contributing editor for Notches, a blog intended to get folks inside and outside of the academy thinking critically about the history of sexuality.
My teaching engages the historical meanings of race, gender and sexuality and how it has connected with culture and politics in the modern United States.
I am revising my manuscript, Save Our Children: Sexual Politics and Cultural Conservatism in the United States, 1965-1990, which is under contract with University of Pennsylvania Press. Save Our Children uses the prism of child protection to analyze how concerns about endangered and dangerous children played a central role in the rise of conservatism. The book traces the emergence of conservative family values politics and the movement’s coalescence around cultural issues. It argues that conservatism’s skillful bridging of racial, gendered and sexual rhetoric fueled its own ascent as well as the backlash against liberalism. Resistance to feminism, the sexualization of popular culture, the civil rights movement and sexual liberalism, in other words, were articulated through a shared child protection rhetoric. The powerful injunction to protect “our children” brought together broad sets of concerns even as it moved conservative ideas and activists from the margins of American politics to its center while pushing liberal and left-wing social movements rightward.
I am also at work on a second book project Seeking Abortion at Home and Abroad: Reproductive Rights, Religious Politics and the Clergy Consultation Service, 1965-1973. This book explores the religious, legal, medical and transnational history of abortion reform activism and illegal abortion services. The project focuses on the Clergy Consultation Service, the single largest abortion referral service in the United States before Roe v Wade. This group, made up of liberal Protestant ministers, Jewish rabbis and dissident Catholic nuns and priests, organized in forty states and over fifty cities to lobby for the repeal of abortion laws, challenge Catholic anti-abortion activists and to assist women obtain safe abortions.edit
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Sixty years ago, an illegal abortion killed her. The case made national news. We still have much to learn from her story.
Research Interests:
The conservative idea that civil rights protections sexually endanger women and children in public bathrooms is not new. In fact, conservative sexual thought has been in the toilet since the 1940s. During the World War II era,... more
The conservative idea that civil rights protections sexually endanger women and children in public bathrooms is not new. In fact, conservative sexual thought has been in the toilet since the 1940s. During the World War II era, conservatives began employing the idea that social equality for African-Americans would lead to sexual danger for white women in bathrooms. In the decades since, conservatives used this trope to negate the civil rights claims of women and sexual minorities. Placing Houston’s rejection of HERO within the history of discrimination against racial minorities, sexual minorities, and women reveals a broader pattern: When previously marginalized groups demanded access to public accommodations, conservatives responded with toilet talk to stall these groups’ aspirations for social equality.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
To reflect upon his life and influence, this piece offers some primary sources to begin thinking about David Bowie’s place in the history of sexuality of the 1970s and 1980s.
